The Effect of the Moon on HIM

[ghetto alchemist]

Understanding the effect of the Moon on HIM.

I've been trying to get my head around this for a long time, and been constantly chasing my tail in the process.
Constantly being dogged with the problem that whatever I can come up with doesn't explain everything, therefore must still be wrong.
Finally came up with something that "feels right".
This is hot off the press, only just got it last night.

Before I go any further though, I just want to remind that this is only an academic exercise, it doesn't really matter whether right or wrong.
The moon's affect on alchemy is already well described, all you need to do is to collect your dew on a full moon, and perform your transmutations on the new moon.
You only need to follow those simple rules, don't need to understand why in order to succeed.
But it's not enough for me, I've always wanted a tangible way to understand it. Here tis...

Start with the important things that we know:
> Terry the alchemist discovered that he could get best transmutation result from copper to gold during a new moon
> Wilhelm Reich's Oranur experiment (1mg of radium in orgone acculator for 30 mins per day) started 3 days before the new moon and continued into 3 days after the new moon with no noteable effects, until the 4th day after the new moon when everything went to shit, people got really sick, some kind of noticeable radiation etc. It was then stopped immediately.
> There's a multitude of alchemy texts which mention to collect dew during cloudless sky on a bright moonlit night in spring or autumn
> Reichenbach discovered that some people are overly sensitive to moon light and will feel uncomfortable and unable to sleep if even the smallest amount of it touches their skin.

Everything following is IMO:

There are 2 noteable reactions WRT HIM particles:
> combines with an alpha particle (or dueterium nucleus) and creates 2 neutrons (proton/neutron + HIM particle + electron -> neutron + neutron)
> combines with proton + electron to form a single neutron (proton + electron + HIM particle -> neutron)

First to specify about the sun...sunlight has distinct 2 components:
> It actually carries HIM particles (or neutrinos) inside it's beams which can physically materialise in/on the Earth.
> It also carries a torsion charge (or spin field) which affects things on Earth that are sensitive to torsion charge (such as pre-existing HIM particles)
[The torsion charge of sunlight is a positive one: >it makes living organisms healthy >it induces the second HIM reaction (the one which makes 1 neutron)]

Then to compare that with the moon....the moon only has 1 component:
> The rays of moonlight carry a torsion charge which is opposite to that of sunlight (being that it's reflected light) which affects things on Earth that are sensitive to torsion charge.
[Moonlight does not have the capacity to manifest HIM particles (or neutrinos) in/or the Earth because the intensity is too weak]
[The torsion charge of moonlight is a negative one: >it makes living organisms sick >it induces the first HIM reaction (the one which makes 2 neutrons)]
[Fortunately moonlight is very weak and the negative effects on the Earth are also very small]

Then briefly describing the shielding device (AKA orgone accumulator, MEOW kettle etc)
> The shielding device causes the air/water inside to increase concentration of HIM particles (probably physically manifests them out of the neutrino stream inside sunlight)
> As the shielding device becomes heavier with contained HIM particles, the 4D/5D nature of the HIM particles starts to warp 4D/5D space in and around the shielding device.
To the 3D world, nothing has changed, but in 4D/5D physics there is a warping/lensing phenomena occurring between the space inside and the space outside the acculmulator.
This warping/lensing effect is exponential according to the concentration and amount of HIM particles inside.
The lensing effect causes the torsion spin of whatever is inside to be magnified in effect on anything on the outside (akin to the lens of a torch making a small light seem much bigger)
Curiously this warping/lensing effect also increases the shields ability to pull in more HIM particles from sunlight (hence why researchers noticed that stored ormus/orgone increases over time).

How this describes the oranur effect:
> The warping/lensing effect of the orgone accululator magnifies the effect of the negative torsion spin in the incoming moonlight.
> This same magnified moonlight induces the 1st reaction on the alpha particles emitted by the radium, forming 2 neutrons.
> The accumulator then becomes an emitter of neutron radiation as the newly formed neutrons leave the accumulator
AND the newly formed neutrons contain the same negative torsion spin that was in the incoming moonlight
AND the warping/lensing effect of the accumulator causes the negative torsion spin on the newly formed neutrons to be massively magnified into the surrounding 3D space.
This is what Reich referred to as the DOR field.
Put simply Reich's radium + orgone accumulator contraption acted as a massive amplifier of the negative effect of moonlight.

How this describes collecting dew on a moonlit night:
> HIM particles are constantly in the air due to oxygen's high affinity for attracting them.
> The negative torsion spin of unhindered moonlight slows down the positive spin on the HIM particles in the air.
Makes them less spiritual and more earthy, and therefore more likely to coalesce into forming dew or get captured by a deliquescent salt.

How this describes Terry's new moon transmutations:
> The lack of moonlight means the HIM particles in his test tube don't follow the "2 neutrons forming" reaction.
> The only reaction Terry sees is the single neutron reaction, which for some as yet unknown reason more likely to produce atomic transmutation in the nucleus (plus it reduces the amount of neutron radiation in his lab).

How this describes Reichenbachs observations of sensitive people finding moonlight uncomfortable:
> They are reacting to the negative torsion spin effect of the moonlight.

That's it...I hope this all makes some sense on paper the same as it does in my head.
In case it's not obvious already....I've been smoking some really good weed recently

 

[Triune One]

Then to compare that with the moon....the moon only has 1 component:
> The rays of moonlight carry a torsion charge which is opposite to that of sunlight (being that it's reflected light) which affects things on Earth that are sensitive to torsion charge.
[Moonlight does not have the capacity to manifest HIM particles (or neutrinos) in/or the Earth because the intensity is too weak]
[The torsion charge of moonlight is a negative one: >it makes living organisms sick >it induces the first HIM reaction (the one which makes 2 neutrons)]
[Fortunately moonlight is very weak and the negative effects on the Earth are also very small]

I love to hear your thoughts on this ghetto but I don't think you're getting everything right here with the moon.

The effect of the moon is highly positive on living organisms.
Seedlings, plants, funghi, will have huge boosts of growth during the full moon.
I can notice the change myself from one day to the next.
Next thing - women often will give birth during full moons.

The "lunatic" is a real phenomenon whereby the full moon will activate and stir up people's emotions.
If those emotions are unwanted trauma, pains of the past, the person will not like the moon.
It's not the moon's fault.

The sun does carry the astral spirit, but it's rays are scattering, entropic.
It causes entropy and its force causes evaporation and "fleeing" from the center of just about everything it shines on.

the moon is the same as the sun, but it is cold and negentropic.
It causes a bringing inward and collection, an ingathering of forces towards order and stillness, as you suggested by

Makes them less spiritual and more earthy, and therefore more likely to coalesce into forming dew or get captured by a deliquescent salt.

I don't know if I'd describe it as less spiritual but yes, it does condense and congeal.
It brings about a center seeking energy of negentropy.

To me, in a nutshell, the moon is the gift of bringing the Astral spirit of the Sun that the Sun cannot do due to its strongly dispersing, heating, and entropic effects. Of course, plants and other creatures that have grown enough can absorb the energy of the sun, but too much sun and there's dryness, death. too much moon and there's too much wetness and fungus, death.
The moon brings the astral spirit by reflection of the sun and is cold, therefore, can deliver the life-giving fructifying nature of the sun without the entropy.
the two need to be balanced for healthy life.

In fact, when they appear equally at the equinoxes (night = day), is the time of the most SM / Astral spirit coming to the Earth.

I'll have to read the rest of your post like 10 more times to wrap my head around what you're saying.
ha! maybe i need a few hits of that good weed you're smoking.

 

[microwatt]

I have found that you can make a magnet for "her" moonlight by cooling your experiment.

 

[ghetto alchemist]

I don't think you're getting everything right here with the moon.

Thanks for the feedback. I'll have to take it on board.
I certainly don't have a very good track record on trying to get my head around the moon's weirdness.

The effect of the moon is highly positive on living organisms.
Seedlings, plants, funghi, will have huge boosts of growth during the full moon.
I can notice the change myself from one day to the next.
Next thing - women often will give birth during full moons.

Make sure that you understand my point though....even though I said moonlight is a negative effect, I see it as akin to a mosquito bite.
WRT a mosquito bite, something is piercing the skin and sucking out our blood, it's a pretty invasive thing.
And yet, at the same time, it's nothing for us when we're healthy.

However, I did not know about boosts of growth during the full moon.
Will have to meditate on that.

The sun does carry the astral spirit, but it's rays are scattering, entropic.
It causes entropy and its force causes evaporation and "fleeing" from the center of just about everything it shines on.

Yeah, I didn't mention that.
Clearly the strong heat of the summer sun does have a very obvious negative effect on my spring water.
So there's something else going on there. I guess I'm not quite there yet.
But I do still think I'm getting pretty close this time, that's why I've put it up here for you guys to tear it to bits. 😖

 

[Kiorionis]

Before I go any further though, I just want to remind that this is only an academic exercise, it doesn't really matter whether right or wrong..

And I’m sure we can get to the bottom of it

You only need to follow those simple rules, don't need to understand why in order to succeed.
But it's not enough for me, I've always wanted a tangible way to understand it

It’s never been enough for me either. And I’ve always loved the Moon. It was the first celestial body that I experimented with in alchemy.

I’ve notice that during the full moon, it is a good time to collect a matter for condensation, and when the matter is collected on the full moon it will typically manifest during the new moon phase.

Which has lead me to conclude the same thing, that the New Moon is a potent force.

I would say the number one thing that I’ve learned is that it’s a continuation of the cycle. The new moon sets up the full moon that sets up the new moon that sets up the full moon that sets up the new moon and etc.

Same thing with plants. Same thing with all life. Same thing with Alchemy.

 

[REL]

This bit of science re: the Moon x Sodium x Earth, and it’s periodic nature, might be interesting:

The moon has a tail, and Earth wears it like a scarf once a month

The tail is invisible to the naked eye but appears on all-sky cameras during every new moon.

www.livescience.com

 

[Pilgrim]

Can't get my head around the notion that the moon is being constantly bombarded with meteors. Certainly not enough to cause this sodium tail. Doesn't add up for me.

 

[ghetto alchemist]

I'm still trying to get my head around these moon effects hi-jinx.
But, once again just like a broken clock, ghetto accidentally tells it right once in a while:

perform your transmutations on the new moon.

Basically the results documented in THIS (#50) post demonstrates that indeed the transmutation reaction only occurs during the new moon.
It seems absolutely absurd...but it turns out that lunar neutrinos have an opposite catalytic effect on HIM reactions.
[Eg: lunar neutrinos prevent the HIM transmutation reaction (aka popcorn reaction) from occurring]

 

[Dendritic Xylem]

It seems absolutely absurd..

The discovery of Od began when Reichenbach noticed the moon's peculiar affect on somnambulists.

 

[Lux Natura]

A short abstract on The Sodium Tail of The Moon. Wikipedia article about it here.

During new moon, when the sodium tail of the moon sweeps across earth, the earths gravity ends up acting like a gravitational lens, focusing the tail.

 

[ghetto alchemist]

A short abstract on The Sodium Tail of The Moon. Wikipedia article about it here.

During new moon, when the sodium tail of the moon sweeps across earth, the earths gravity ends up acting like a gravitational lens, focusing the tail.

Thanks for the links with extra information about the sodium tail.

Some information which I think is very pertinant to understanding the effect of moonlight and its bizarre capacity to stop HIM based transmutation reactions, is the following graphs:

The information was presented in Pollack's book [LINK].
The first graph shows how light emmission from an enzyme catalysed reaction in water changes over time, assumed that the variation on Sat 120 is during the time of the eclipse [also assumed that this experiment is performed using HIM containing water].
The second graph shows in much greater detail how the light emmission varies during what is assumed to be the same lunar eclipse.

When I look at the graph, what I see is that as soon as the lunar eclipse starts, the light output shoots up much higher than it would have otherwise been expected to be.
IMO it's a total head-fuck...but another corroboration of what was already mentioned in post #8.
Specifically there appears to be something in reflected moonlight that stops/brakes certain reactions from occuring.
And once the moonlight is attenuated, the reaction can suddenly proceed unhindered.

I previously said I thought it was caused by neutrinos, but I've since found out that there are no neutrinos in moonlight.
So now I really don't have any idea about what exactly could be causing the effect.
But I can say that if you're seeing the same reaction improving effect during a lunar eclipse as you are during a new moon, then IMO it can't possibly be due to the sodium tail.

 

[Lux Natura]

I can tell you that an experiment I had been running using little else than sea salt dissolved in dew drastically changed sometime around August 28th. I will have to run it again so its ready for March 3rd to verify if it was the lunar eclipse having an effect.

It's just sea salt oversaturated in dew in a sealed container in incubation, that had been sitting for quite a while without change, several months actually, and one day I noted the salt overnight climbed up the inside walls of the glass. It is still climbing and changing slowly. The jar is approximately 30cm tall, and the salt climbed around 20cm overnight after having done nothing for months.

The incubation chamber on the inside is lined with aluminized bubble wrap to help keep the heat in, with 2 IR ceramic heating elements keeping a stable temperature (has external sensor and temperature controller).

May be a coincidence, but I will run another test around March 3rd to see if the lunar eclipse has any effect. Also should mention a few other containers in the incubation space also underwent changes right around this time, notably the iron acetate solutions, which had been there for several months and around the same time suddenly changed their appearance.

 

[ghetto alchemist]

I will run another test around March 3rd to see if the lunar eclipse has any effect

Nice. Looking forward to whatever you report back.

 

[nav2010]

The lunar cycles can cause neap tides involving the shift of trillions of tons of sea water, it causes the planet to become egg shaped.
It will make short work of causing an high tide within your body too the effects of which are felt worldwide.

 

[Pilgrim]

So on that basis you should be able to fill a glass half full with water and mark its level with a pen and then watch that level rise and fall with the passing of the moon. Does that actually happen? I very much doubt it but maybe someone would like to try.

 

[Lux Natura]

The tides are something different - yes it is an every slightly "egg shaped" distortion of the water, twice a day, so there are two high tides and two low tides a day. Well, a bit more than a day, actually 24 hours and 50 or so minutes. It is always egg shaped, just the egg shape is rotating, twice a day.

A lunar eclipse is when the moon is entirely in the earths shadow, so its a special type of full moon. A new moon is the opposite, that is, when the moon is basically between the earth and the sun. During the new moon, the earth gets the moons sodium tail, which may or may not have any sort of effect, as the actual count of how much sodium reaches the earth is very minimal.

The bicarbonate salt / luminol in water could easily be replicated. For people in the past who have use modified webcams, with the filters removed, and the focus set to macro, to pick up radioactive decay from old smoke detectors (americium-241), a similar setup can be used, in a dark box, outputting the data to a bit of code. I'm willing to bet that the "light" being emitted is actually from a radioactive or other such nuclear force, that is exciting the luminol.

I'm actually going to add that to my ever list of growing projects to try!

 

[nav2010]

So on that basis you should be able to fill a glass half full with water and mark its level with a pen and then watch that level rise and fall with the passing of the moon. Does that actually happen? I very much doubt it but maybe someone would like to try.

You see everything as scientific don't you? You never see a figure of speech or metaphor for what it is.
No there is not a physical high tide in your body, it's a metaphor.
A metaphor to explain how people behave during a full moon.

 

[Lux Natura]

I think you could catch more flies with honey than with vinegar.

 

[Andro]

Mod Post

You really are thicker than a submarine door aren't you?

Personal attacks are not allowed on Alchemy Forums. Argue the point, not the person.

Thanks.

 

[nav2010]

Mod Post



Personal attacks are not allowed on Alchemy Forums. Argue the point, not the person.

Thanks.

Edited. My apologies